<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who are you Optimising for with Personalised Search?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/seo/personalised-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/seo/personalised-search/</link>
	<description>SEO - Surfing - Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:39:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Green</title>
		<link>http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/seo/personalised-search/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/?p=148#comment-409</guid>
		<description>@Dan - I think that&#039;s a good idea to test, and it avoids sending people to the SERP where they could get lost.

@Jonaths - From what I have seen, the personalisation of a results page only seems to favour a site that you have clicked through to from another (or the same) SERP. For what I was describing, the visit to the site wouldn&#039;t have to be a bounced visit - but how much would a bounce from a site negatively affect a site&#039;s ranking (in terms of Vince), against the potentially positive effect of you having visited that site (in terms of personalisation).

Now I am getting confused as well!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan &#8211; I think that&#8217;s a good idea to test, and it avoids sending people to the SERP where they could get lost.</p>
<p>@Jonaths &#8211; From what I have seen, the personalisation of a results page only seems to favour a site that you have clicked through to from another (or the same) SERP. For what I was describing, the visit to the site wouldn&#8217;t have to be a bounced visit &#8211; but how much would a bounce from a site negatively affect a site&#8217;s ranking (in terms of Vince), against the potentially positive effect of you having visited that site (in terms of personalisation).</p>
<p>Now I am getting confused as well!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonaths</title>
		<link>http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/seo/personalised-search/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonaths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/?p=148#comment-408</guid>
		<description>I could be way off here (I normally am), but from what I&#039;ve seen I wouldn&#039;t say personalised search is query dependent, just visit dependent.  So imagine you regularly visit www.example.com, and that page has content for &quot;widgets&quot;, but you&#039;ve never visited www.example.com/widgets, and you&#039;ve certainly never Googled &quot;example widgets&quot;.  So the first time you do a search for &quot;widgets&quot;, Google artificially increases the rankings for www.example.com/widgets.

As you say, if someone searches for &quot;example widget&quot; and then bounces, then that perhaps isn&#039;t a great signal that www.example.com should rank for &quot;widgets&quot;.  But having said that, isn&#039;t that exactly how Vince works?  I&#039;m confusing myself now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could be way off here (I normally am), but from what I&#8217;ve seen I wouldn&#8217;t say personalised search is query dependent, just visit dependent.  So imagine you regularly visit <a href="http://www.example.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com</a>, and that page has content for &#8220;widgets&#8221;, but you&#8217;ve never visited <a href="http://www.example.com/widgets" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com/widgets</a>, and you&#8217;ve certainly never Googled &#8220;example widgets&#8221;.  So the first time you do a search for &#8220;widgets&#8221;, Google artificially increases the rankings for <a href="http://www.example.com/widgets" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com/widgets</a>.</p>
<p>As you say, if someone searches for &#8220;example widget&#8221; and then bounces, then that perhaps isn&#8217;t a great signal that <a href="http://www.example.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com</a> should rank for &#8220;widgets&#8221;.  But having said that, isn&#8217;t that exactly how Vince works?  I&#8217;m confusing myself now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/seo/personalised-search/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/?p=148#comment-407</guid>
		<description>I wonder if I&#039;m Feeling Lucky, or Address Bar searches count?

You could put I&#039;m feeling lucky links in all your email marketing:

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=bbc+news&amp;btnI=I%27m+Feeling+Lucky&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g4g-s1g5&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=

Address bar searches seem to use gfns=1 to auto redirect to the first result:

http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;sourceid=navclient&amp;gfns=0&amp;q=bbc+news

Would be worth checking out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if I&#8217;m Feeling Lucky, or Address Bar searches count?</p>
<p>You could put I&#8217;m feeling lucky links in all your email marketing:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=bbc+news&amp;btnI=I%27m+Feeling+Lucky&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g4g-s1g5&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=bbc+news&amp;btnI=I%27m+Feeling+Lucky&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g4g-s1g5&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=</a></p>
<p>Address bar searches seem to use gfns=1 to auto redirect to the first result:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;sourceid=navclient&amp;gfns=0&amp;q=bbc+news" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;sourceid=navclient&amp;gfns=0&amp;q=bbc+news</a></p>
<p>Would be worth checking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

