<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rel=Canonical Doesn’t Solve International SEO Problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/seo/relcanonical-doesn%e2%80%99t-solve-international-seo-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/seo/relcanonical-doesn%e2%80%99t-solve-international-seo-problems/</link>
	<description>SEO - Surfing - Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:15:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tiroir</title>
		<link>http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/seo/relcanonical-doesn%e2%80%99t-solve-international-seo-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>tiroir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/?p=135#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob,

Don&#039;t be confused, I bet they just came across some mess of duplicate content as can easily happen on international websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be confused, I bet they just came across some mess of duplicate content as can easily happen on international websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/seo/relcanonical-doesn%e2%80%99t-solve-international-seo-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/?p=135#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Both Google and Yahoo have said having the same content on multiple ccTLDs isn&#039;t an issue. 

So for example I guess if you have only one domain hosting US, UK and Australian content that&#039;s pretty much identical, you can get around it by geo-targeting the sub-folders appropriately.

Source: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/new-info-from-google-and-yahoo-tilts-the-geotargeting-balance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Google and Yahoo have said having the same content on multiple ccTLDs isn&#8217;t an issue. </p>
<p>So for example I guess if you have only one domain hosting US, UK and Australian content that&#8217;s pretty much identical, you can get around it by geo-targeting the sub-folders appropriately.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/new-info-from-google-and-yahoo-tilts-the-geotargeting-balance" rel="nofollow">http://www.seomoz.org/blog/new-info-from-google-and-yahoo-tilts-the-geotargeting-balance</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Green</title>
		<link>http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/seo/relcanonical-doesn%e2%80%99t-solve-international-seo-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/?p=135#comment-120</guid>
		<description>@kelvinnewman - apologies if i sound like I am calling you out specifically. I have heard this more than once, not just from you.

By using the canonical tag you ensuring that one version of a particular language content will never rank, in any engines. 

The point of being a business that operates in more than one country is that you have a website that has content that can be shown to users in all of those countries. The canonical tag can solve duplicate content issues, but should be used to canonicalise two pages aimed at different markets, in my opinion.

If I operated in the UK and US (for instance), and used the canonical tag to point all the US pages to their UK equivalents, people searching in the US would never see the US pages, and the UK pages would never rank very well in the US SERPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kelvinnewman &#8211; apologies if i sound like I am calling you out specifically. I have heard this more than once, not just from you.</p>
<p>By using the canonical tag you ensuring that one version of a particular language content will never rank, in any engines. </p>
<p>The point of being a business that operates in more than one country is that you have a website that has content that can be shown to users in all of those countries. The canonical tag can solve duplicate content issues, but should be used to canonicalise two pages aimed at different markets, in my opinion.</p>
<p>If I operated in the UK and US (for instance), and used the canonical tag to point all the US pages to their UK equivalents, people searching in the US would never see the US pages, and the UK pages would never rank very well in the US SERPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelvinnewman</title>
		<link>http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/seo/relcanonical-doesn%e2%80%99t-solve-international-seo-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>kelvinnewman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intrinsic-green.co.uk/?p=135#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Like i said in our post, having unique content for each variation is always going to be the best option.

But if you have 10k pages it&#039;s going to be difficult to scale the process of making them all unique. I think the rel canon can be a good hack or work-round, do you not think it could work in that kind of situation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like i said in our post, having unique content for each variation is always going to be the best option.</p>
<p>But if you have 10k pages it&#8217;s going to be difficult to scale the process of making them all unique. I think the rel canon can be a good hack or work-round, do you not think it could work in that kind of situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
